Agent Kernel vs Agent Framework

A framework supplies components a developer assembles. A kernel runs the cycle itself, verifies outcomes, and updates its own weights.

Which one updates its own behavior?

The kernel. A framework does not change its own strategy; the application code does. The kernel adapts its strategy weights automatically based on verified outcomes.

Can a framework be used inside a kernel?

Yes. A kernel can use a framework for some components, but the cycle itself belongs to the kernel. The framework acts as a tool, not the driver.

Does a kernel require a framework?

No. The cycle, the verification step, and the weight update belong to the kernel. It is self-contained and does not need an external framework to manage its operations.

Who writes the adaptation logic?

In a kernel, the system updates weights automatically. In a framework, the developer must write the logic to handle failures, retries, and state changes.

How is verification handled?

The kernel has a built-in verification step in every cycle. A framework relies on the developer to implement verification as an external check.

What is the core difference in control?

The kernel controls the lifecycle of the task. The framework provides the tools, but the developer controls the lifecycle through code.